﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>MiNDFOOD / MiNDFOOD / ENVIRONMENT </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>MiNDFOOD</description><link>http://forum.mindfood.com/</link><webMaster>claire@mindfood.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:42:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>The green debate: Two sides to every story</title><link>http://forum.mindfood.com/Topic96-10-1.aspx</link><description>Recently, a MiNDFOOD reader sent us the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What a breath of fresh air – a magazine with in-depth articles instead of silly celebrity chit-chat. Your &lt;i&gt;Climate Change Warriors&lt;/i&gt; story was of great interest, and I have the utmost admiration for those who advocate and work for changes in the way we care for our environment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I was surprised that the individuals about whom you wrote, cited only Al Gore’s film, and not the outstanding BBC presentation which was basically a rebuttal of many of his pseudo-scientific "facts". In fact, the British government recalled copies of Mr Gore’s film that were to be sent out to schools in Britain, because of the controversy about many of the film’s errors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Environmental issues should be taken very seriously, and this also means looking at both sides of the story."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tell us what you think. Have you seen Al Gore's &lt;i&gt;An Inconvenient Truth&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[img]http://www.thedailygreen.com/cm/thedailygreen/images/7o/antartica-glacier-md.jpg[/img]</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:30:39 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>