InstantForum.NET v4.1.4MiNDFOODhttp://forum.mindfood.com/claire@mindfood.comThu, 17 May 2012 10:53:50 GMT20http://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspx<a href=" http://www.lvbags.uk.com/">Louis Vuitton</a>, the brand that mostly catches every women's attention. No woman can deny this fact, since its classic design and distinct color always come in style and fashion. <a href=" http://www.lvbags.uk.com/">Louis Vuitton bags</a> are considered as every woman's dream to own. Here has <a href=" http://www.lvbags.uk.com/">LV bags</a> estore which will fulfill your dream at an affordable price. You can surely get your desired cheap <a href=" http://www.lvbags.uk.com/">louis vuitton outlet</a> at the lower price in here.Happy shopping !Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:13:23 GMTeileenhttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxIt's really not our concern. I for one am not about to make judgements based on what I've read in NW or Famous.<br><br>Their dedication to their children, which as far as I can tell is 100% genuine, is something i think should be praised. There's far worse cases out there.Tue, 24 May 2011 18:13:05 GMTkimboyhttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxWhat quality of parenting can be given to a brood so large in a world so fast. I have not seen a recent pic yet of either of these parents looking relaxed, without dark circles under their eyes - the effects parenthood of a family so young in age clearly taking its toll. I don't think it matters how much money you have got to supply the materialistic needs - at the end of the day the quality of one on one time to cherish and coach a child into become an incredible, balanced adult - costs the same.Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:02:58 GMTSamanthahttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxI am not a fan of Angelina, but I think her motherhood instincts are spot on. She may not be following the same path as many of us, but to think that 3 children have been adopted because of her (and Brad) its quite heartwarming. Having said that, I am all about Team Aniston.Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:38:03 GMTHowieJhttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspx<br><br>Like most things in life, quantity most definitely does not equate to quality.<br><br>When it comes to children, quality is the ability to spend vast amounts of time with your child. The more children there are, the more likely they are to feel neglected as their parent's time is divided. Not that people should not have large families, but what children love and seek more than anything is time with their parents - especially one to one time, which is the biggest challenge of being a parent, in my mind.<br><br>GeorgeMon, 22 Dec 2008 14:59:28 GMTgeorgehttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxIt's really not our concern. I for one am not about to make judgements based on what I've read in NW or Famous. <br><br>Their dedication to their children, which as far as I can tell is 100% genuine, is something i think should be praised. There's far worse cases out there.Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:46 GMTLulahttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxI don't agree at all ... how can you judge how much love and attention a child is getting based on the number of kids in a family? I'm from a family of 4 and certainly received an ample dose of love and attention.Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:16:28 GMTsarahjanehttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxI can see your point, but at the same time Brad and Angelina are saving children (the ones that they adopt) from a life much, much worse. I am sure each of their adopted children get more attention and love than they ever could have hoped for. While wealth can not provide happiness, it can provide opportunities that these children would never have had otherwise.Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:14:56 GMTMolly Heiplikhttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxPersonally I agree, I could not do it.<br><br>However I have a talented friend with 6 adorable children ranging from 15 to 3. She has the energy for such a task and her children are bright, considerate, loving and interested in people around them. Her husband passed away from Cancer last year, and she maintains an amazing energy and positivity around her home.<br><br>So I am not big on judging other people.Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:12:58 GMTKarenhttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxI'm not following the logic of this one. Large families may not be common these days, but just a few generations back it was "normal". My grandmother was one of nine children. She and her siblings grew up in a very loving family environment and, in turn, their respective families were brought up in nurturing, loving environments. Family is first. Always has been and always will be. <br><br>I can't see anything wrong with what Brad and Ang are doing. Besides, who are we to comment?Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:58:17 GMTJanehttp://forum.mindfood.com/Topic81-9-1.aspxWe received the following letter from one of readers recently:<br><br>"Brangelina have mistaken quantity for quality when it comes to the size of their family. Nature spaces children so that parents at least have a chance of giving each precious child the time that they need from their parents. Their large brood cannot possibly be getting the individual love and attention from their parents that they deserve."<br><br>Do you agree? Tell us what you think.<br>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:45:46 GMTAdmin